Rejected Claim vs. Denied Claim - What's the Difference?

Image Description

August 27, 2026

The terms rejected claim and denied claim are sometimes used interchangeably, but they describe two different outcomes in the medical claim lifecycle.

A rejected claim generally fails before adjudication because the submission did not satisfy required claim or processing edits. A denied claim, on the other hand, has generally been accepted for adjudication and processed by the payer, but payment was denied or otherwise adjusted based on the payer's adjudication decision.

Understanding whether a claim was rejected or denied is important because the next step can be very different. A rejection commonly requires correcting the claim and resubmitting it, while a denial may require a claim correction, additional information, reconsideration, appeal or another payer-specific action.

Rejected Claim vs. Denied Claim: The Quick Answer

Rejected Claim: The claim did not successfully proceed into adjudication. Review the rejection, correct the reported problem and generally resubmit the claim according to payer instructions.

Denied Claim: The claim was adjudicated, but the payer determined that some or all of the submitted charges would not be paid as billed. Review the payer's adjudication information to determine whether the appropriate response is a correction, reconsideration, appeal or another action.

What Is a Rejected Medical Claim?

A rejected medical claim is a claim that fails an acceptance or validation step before adjudication is completed. The rejection means that the claim, as submitted, cannot continue through normal claim processing until the reported problem is addressed.

Depending on the claim submission workflow, validation may occur at multiple points. For example, an electronic claim may be reviewed by a clearinghouse, intermediary or payer before it is accepted into the payer's adjudication process.

A rejection may result from invalid information, missing required information, data that does not satisfy payer edits or another problem identified during claim validation.

What Is a Denied Medical Claim?

A denied medical claim has generally progressed beyond the claim acceptance process and has been adjudicated by the payer.

During adjudication, the payer evaluates the claim using applicable benefits, coverage rules, contracts, payment policies and other requirements. The payer may determine that all or part of the submitted charges should not be paid as billed.

A denial therefore represents an adjudication outcome, rather than a front-end claim acceptance problem.

A Denial Does Not Always Mean the Entire Claim Was Unpaid

Adjudication decisions and adjustments can apply to an entire claim or to individual service lines. A claim may contain paid services as well as services that were denied or otherwise adjusted.

Rejected Claim vs. Denied Claim

The most important difference is where the claim is in the processing lifecycle when the problem occurs.

Rejected Claim Denied Claim
Generally occurs before adjudication Occurs as a result of adjudication
The claim did not successfully continue through claim acceptance/validation The claim was accepted for processing and evaluated by the payer
Often involves missing, invalid or unacceptable claim information Often involves coverage, payment, coding, authorization, medical policy or other adjudication issues
Common response is to correct the reported problem and resubmit Response depends on the reason for the denial
May be reported through a 277CA or another claim acknowledgment Adjudication information may be reported through an ERA, paper remittance or payer portal

Where Rejections and Denials Occur in the Claim Lifecycle

Looking at the basic claim lifecycle makes the distinction easier to understand.

1. Claim Submitted
The provider or billing entity submits the claim.
2. Claim Validation and Acceptance
The claim passes through applicable acknowledgment, validation and acceptance processes.
Problem at this stage?
The claim may be rejected and returned for correction.
3. Adjudication
An accepted claim is evaluated by the payer under applicable coverage and payment rules.
4. Adjudication Result
Services may be paid, denied or otherwise adjusted based on the payer's determination.

This is why identifying the stage at which the problem occurred is often more useful than simply asking whether the claim was "not paid."

How Can You Tell Whether a Claim Was Rejected or Denied?

Start by reviewing the response received after the claim was submitted.

If the response indicates that the claim was not accepted for processing or identifies a claim validation problem that must be corrected before adjudication, you are generally dealing with a rejection.

If the payer accepted and adjudicated the claim and the response explains why payment was reduced or denied, you are generally dealing with a denial or other adjudication adjustment.

Question to Ask What the Answer May Indicate
Was the claim accepted into adjudication? If no, review the claim as a possible rejection.
Did the payer adjudicate the claim? If yes, the issue is no longer simply a front-end rejection.
Did you receive a 277CA showing a rejection? Review the reported rejection information and correct the claim.
Did you receive an ERA or other remittance showing an adjudication decision? Review the adjustment or denial information to determine the appropriate next action.

Common Reasons Medical Claims Are Rejected

Claim rejection reasons vary by payer and submission workflow, but common examples can include:

  • missing required claim information
  • invalid or incorrectly formatted information
  • invalid provider or subscriber identifiers
  • patient or subscriber information that fails validation
  • invalid dates or other claim data
  • claim information that does not satisfy payer-specific edits
  • other data or submission errors that prevent the claim from proceeding to adjudication

The acknowledgment or rejection report should be reviewed to determine the specific reason the claim was rejected rather than assuming the cause based only on the fact that the claim was not accepted.

Common Reasons Medical Claims Are Denied

Denials occur during adjudication and can result from many different payer determinations.

Examples may include:

  • the service is not covered under the patient's benefits
  • required authorization or referral requirements were not satisfied
  • the payer determines that coding or billing requirements were not met
  • timely filing requirements were not satisfied
  • the service is considered bundled with another service
  • medical necessity or other medical policy requirements were not met
  • coordination of benefits information affects payment
  • another payer policy or benefit rule results in nonpayment or an adjustment

The appropriate response depends on the actual denial reason. A denial should not automatically be treated as a claim that simply needs to be resubmitted.

What Should You Do After a Claim Is Rejected?

When a claim is rejected, review the acknowledgment or payer report to identify the reason for the rejection.

The general workflow is:

  1. Identify the rejection reason.
  2. Determine which claim information caused the rejection.
  3. Correct the reported problem.
  4. Resubmit the claim according to payer instructions.
  5. Review the subsequent acknowledgment to verify that the corrected claim was accepted.

Rejected Claims Are Generally Resubmitted as Original

If a claim was rejected before adjudication, there may be no adjudicated claim to replace or void. After correcting the rejection, the claim is generally resubmitted as an Original Claim (1), subject to payer-specific requirements.

This is different from submitting a Replacement Claim (7) for a previously adjudicated claim.

What Should You Do After a Claim Is Denied?

A denial requires a different analysis because the payer has already adjudicated the claim.

Start by determining why the payer denied or adjusted the claim. The appropriate next action may include:

  • providing requested information or documentation
  • correcting inaccurate claim information
  • submitting a replacement claim when required by the payer
  • requesting reconsideration
  • filing an appeal
  • addressing coordination of benefits or authorization requirements
  • taking another action specified by the payer

Does a Rejected Claim Use Claim Frequency Type Code 1, 7 or 8?

The distinction between rejection and adjudication is especially important when determining the appropriate Claim Frequency Type Code.

Situation Typical Claim Frequency Type to Review
Claim was rejected before adjudication and needs to be corrected and resubmitted 1 - Original
Claim was adjudicated and needs to be replaced with corrected claim information 7 - Replacement
Claim was adjudicated and should be canceled 8 - Void/Cancel

Note: These are general distinctions. Always follow the payer's current claim submission, correction and resubmission requirements.

A Denied Claim Does Not Automatically Mean Code 7

Because a denied claim has been adjudicated, it may be tempting to assume that the next submission should always be a Replacement Claim (7). That is not necessarily the case.

First determine why the claim was denied.

Claim Information Was Incorrect

If information submitted on the adjudicated claim needs to be corrected, review whether the payer requires a replacement claim or another correction process.

Claim Information Was Correct

If the submitted information was correct but the provider disagrees with the payer's adjudication decision, reconsideration or appeal may be the appropriate path.

The fact that a claim was denied tells you that adjudication occurred. It does not, by itself, tell you which action should be taken next.

How the 277CA Relates to Rejected Claims

The 277CA Health Care Claim Acknowledgment is used in electronic claim processing to communicate claim acknowledgment and status information, including whether claims were accepted or rejected.

A rejected claim reported on a 277CA has not successfully moved forward into adjudication. The 277CA can provide status information that helps identify the reason the claim was rejected so the problem can be corrected.

277CA = Claim Acknowledgment and Status Information

Think of the 277CA primarily as answering questions such as: "Was my claim accepted or rejected?" and, if it was rejected, "What status information explains why?"

The 277CA communicates claim acceptance and rejection status before adjudication. It is not the payer's final payment determination.

Need Help Interpreting a 277CA Status?

Use our 277CA Claim Status Lookup to review claim acknowledgment status information and help interpret common rejection details.

View the 277CA Claim Status Lookup

Electronic claim workflows can contain more than one acknowledgment, and a claim may pass one validation step before being rejected at another. Review the sender and status information to understand which entity generated the acknowledgment and what happened to the claim.

How the ERA Relates to Denied Claims

After a payer adjudicates a claim, an Electronic Remittance Advice (ERA) can communicate payment and adjustment information for the claim and its service lines. In standard electronic healthcare transactions, the ERA is transmitted using the X12 835 Health Care Claim Payment/Advice transaction.

The ERA can include standardized adjustment information that explains why charges were reduced, denied or otherwise adjusted. This information helps determine why the payer reached its adjudication decision and what action, if any, may be appropriate.

ERA = Adjudication and Payment Information

Think of the ERA as answering questions such as: "How did the payer process this claim, what was paid or adjusted, and why?"

Providers that receive paper remittance information or use a payer portal may obtain similar adjudication details through those channels rather than directly reviewing an electronic ERA.

Rejected vs. Denied Claim Examples

The following examples show why identifying the claim's processing stage matters before deciding what to do next.

Example 1: Invalid Information Causes a Rejection

A professional claim is submitted electronically. A claim acknowledgment reports that required information is invalid and the claim is rejected before adjudication.

Typical action: Review the rejection, correct the invalid information and generally resubmit the claim as an Original Claim (1) according to payer instructions.

Example 2: Service Is Denied During Adjudication

The payer accepts the claim and completes adjudication. The remittance information indicates that a service was denied based on an applicable payer policy.

Typical action: Review the specific denial information and payer requirements before deciding whether a correction, documentation, reconsideration, appeal or another response is appropriate.

Example 3: Adjudicated Claim Contains Incorrect Information

The payer adjudicates a claim, but the provider later discovers that information reported on the claim was incorrect.

Typical action: Review whether the payer requires a Replacement Claim (7) containing the corrected claim information.

Example 4: Provider Disagrees With the Denial

The payer adjudicates the claim using the information submitted. The provider believes the claim was billed correctly but disagrees with the payer's denial decision.

Typical action: Review the payer's reconsideration or appeal procedures rather than automatically changing and resubmitting the claim.

Common Rejected vs. Denied Claim Mistakes

Common Mistake Why It Can Be a Problem
Calling every unpaid claim a denial A rejected claim may never have reached adjudication, so the required response can be very different.
Using Code 7 for a pre-adjudication rejection There may be no adjudicated claim for the payer to replace.
Resubmitting a denied claim without reviewing the denial reason The same claim may be denied again or treated as a duplicate if the underlying issue is not addressed.
Assuming receipt means acceptance A claim can be received and still fail a subsequent validation or acceptance step.
Assuming every denial requires a corrected claim Some denials may require documentation, reconsideration, appeal or another payer-defined process instead.
Ignoring subsequent claim responses after resubmission The corrected submission should be monitored to verify that it was accepted and continued through processing.

Where Rejected and Denied Claims Fit With Corrected Claims

Whether a claim was rejected or denied helps determine what kind of correction, if any, is needed.

A rejected claim generally needs the reported rejection problem corrected so that the claim can successfully proceed into adjudication. A denied claim has already been adjudicated, so the provider must first determine whether the problem is incorrect claim information or disagreement with the payer's decision.

Learn More About Corrected and Replacement Claims

Our corrected vs. replacement claim guide explains how pre-adjudication corrections differ from replacing a claim that has already been adjudicated.

Corrected Claim vs. Replacement Claim: What's the Difference?

Frequently Asked Questions

A rejected claim generally fails before adjudication and must have the reported rejection problem addressed before it can proceed through claim processing. A denied claim has generally been adjudicated, but the payer determined that some or all of the submitted charges would not be paid as billed.

A claim rejection generally occurs before the claim successfully proceeds through adjudication. Review the applicable acknowledgment or payer response to determine exactly where the submission failed.

Yes. A denial is an adjudication outcome. The payer has processed the claim or service and determined that payment will be denied or otherwise adjusted based on the applicable adjudication reason.

Generally, yes. Review the rejection reason, correct the reported problem and resubmit the claim according to the payer's requirements. A pre-adjudication rejection is generally resubmitted as an Original Claim (1).

Not automatically. Review why the payer denied or adjusted the claim first. Depending on the reason, the appropriate response may be a claim correction, replacement claim, additional documentation, reconsideration, appeal or another payer-specific action.

A 277CA Health Care Claim Acknowledgment can report whether claims were accepted or rejected and provide status information about rejected claims. It is an acknowledgment transaction rather than a final payment determination.

An ERA reports adjudication and payment information and uses standardized adjustment information to explain financial adjustments to claims and service lines. Review the applicable adjustment and remark information to understand the payer's determination.

Important: Claim rejection, denial, correction, resubmission and appeal procedures can vary by payer and program. The information in this guide provides a general overview and should be used together with the payer's current billing, claim submission and appeal requirements.


We hope you found this article helpful! Please reach out to us with questions/feedback.